  |
|
|
View previous topic
::
View next topic
|
| Author |
Message |
Yaron
Joined:
13 Nov 2003
Posts:
196
Location:
New York City
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 2:50 pm
Post subject:
|
 |
|
| oscar wrote: | | I can vouch for Guest in saying that the free and paid version of wordtracker yields the same search results for demand - it will vary for supply because the number of sites in alta are vastly different from google and the other SEs. |
Greetings Oscar.
This is true, but how is it vouching for Guest? This is what I said, while Guest was trying to shoot down my words. You're vouching for me! Thank you. 
Here are my exact words:
| Yaron wrote: |
Actually the Wordtracker figures are approx. searches per day, and the free Wordtracker uses the same word database as the full version (I tested it myself). Wordtracker does not use Alta Vista for its keyword database. It uses metacrawler search engines to compile its database of keywords, these results are then extrapolated to give the number of total searches per day. At least that's what they claim. Alta Vista is used for competitive analysis (for the supply) in the free version.
|
Regards,
Yaron |
|
| Back to top |
   |
 |
oscar
Joined:
12 Sep 2003
Posts:
15
|
Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2003 7:28 pm
Post subject:
|
|
|
Humble apologies Yaron - I must have been reading too fast (again)...
Oscar |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
