Advice Articles
Top Articles
- Successful Affiliate: Becky Turner
- "Show us something better and we'll give you $50,000"
- Affiliate Marketing Success Story
- How to make $1000 a month online from scratch
- Free Affiliate Masters Course
- Best Affiliate Programs
- SBI Value Exchange - free reciprocal links
- Affiliate Program Tutorial
- How to boost your AdSense revenue
- Web affiliate programs experiment 2
Stay In Touch
Google Cleans House
The latest round of changes to Google’s ranking formula will have far reaching effects on the affiliate marketing and internet marketing world.
As I mentioned a couple of weeks ago, Google released formula changes regarding duplicate content and how they handle it. Simply put, you don’t want to directly copy other people’s content any more or Google will give you “suboptimal” rankings.
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/google-search-and-search-engine-spam.html
For the past few years, quite a few “big names” worldwide have been selling software and methods of producing websites from other people’s content, especially that found in article directories such as EzineArticles. In other words, using duplicate content to build blogs and sites designed only to grab traffic from the search engines.
It wasn’t a process supported by experienced marketers who like to build long term, ongoing income producing sites. Why not? Because the search engines have always said that they like to show quality, original content in their results and business builders respect their number 1 source of ongoing leads.
What do the changes mean if you have been using duplicate content?
It remains to be seen but people are reporting a large drop in many of their rankings where they have used articles from article directories to form the basis of their sites. Not all sites are being affected but I would think that this will change as Google tracks the effectiveness of its formula and tweaks it even more.
These sites, let’s call them what they often are – website spam, have long been an annoying part of the internet landscape and in my opinion rank up there with directories and link farms in terms of their time wasting presence. They take up valuable space at the top of the SERPs that could be filled by a credible source, NOT someone just filling white space with advertising.
Google’s step is a positive one for us as dedicated affiliate marketers. It means that if we produce sites with quality content, we will be rewarded and the spammers will be kept out of our way. Will it stop the spam? For a while, but that’s normal and Google will keep watching. One thing’s for sure… they took way too long to implement this change. It should have happened at least two years ago.
Side effects of this change
If your pages have been used by someone else to produce content for their site, you may find your rankings suffering too. Some article writing software takes paragraphs from articles and websites and strings them together to make a “new” one. Some marketers have been using these tools to compile content for their sites, effectively stealing part of yours. If you notice a drop in traffic, do a search in Google for some of your text. In a worst case scenario, you may need to rewrite all your pages.
What about content spinning?
There are lots of rumors around regarding content spinning. I’m sure most of us have tried it at some stage. Spinning is done by using a tool to replace common words and phrases with synonyms. By doing this, you can effectively create a new-ish article. How new is the question? 10%, 30%, 60%?
The rumor mill is implying that Google can now tell if an article is spun. Whether it’s true or not, I believe that they could do it, if they wanted to.
It would be quite easy to write a formula that can reverse engineer a spin. Then it would only take a series of runs to determine if the article is spun. Think of if as breaking a substitution code. You know the one, when you write Z you actually mean A.
A B C D E F etc
Z Y X W V U
How do you avoid “suboptimized” ranking results?
Write your own content!
Almost 100% of the content on AssociatePrograms.com is original except where we have used quotes. Yes, other people have displayed our content on their sites but ours is indexed first and seen by the search engines as the first example thereby making ours the authority article. That means we keep our rankings and the copiers lose theirs, hopefully ☺
If you’re unsure how to write an article, try my favorite formula for article writing in this article from last year. It has been used by many people and has proved itself to be the quickest, easiest way to produce quality articles.
For long-term success with Google, the QUALITY of the words you write is becoming more and more important. Google is working hard at finding high-quality articles. So make sure you give Google what it wants.
People love original thoughts, opinions and ideas. You don’t have to be a perfect speller and you don’t have to have perfect grammar. You just have to write honestly and openly.
Readers are very forgiving if you have useful, interesting and informative content. And, in the end that’s what you want if you want then to buy an affiliate product you’re promoting.
So go back and review your site, check your stats and if you are seeing issues, today would be a great day to start rewriting, refreshing and improving your content.
What if you don't like writing articles?
By Allan Gardyne
Are you sick and tired of writing your own articles? Or perhaps you just want to save time so you can concentrate on the parts of your business you enjoy?
A really good, reliable alternative is to use a trusted writing service. What you want is a service that has trained freelance writers who create REAL articles - unique, targeted, search engine optimized articles. And you want them to write articles for you based on the keywords you provide, for a very reasonable price.
Content Kingdom writers do exactly that. They write original, unique articles for you.
Some affiliates use articles from Content Kingdom's writers without changing a word. It's up to you, but I recommend you tweak them a little, adding your own voice and personality, and now and again a few words based on your own experience.
Read the testimonials, then try a few articles and see what you think.
Learn more about Content Kingdom here
Newsletter Sign-up
Your Host

Learn from an affiliate veteran.
Your host, Allan Gardyne, has been earning a good living from affiliate programs since 1998.






I am so glad to hear all of the theories of what is going to happen. I'll be a lot happier when I see it happen.
I have made it a habit to keep an eye on some of my top ranked articles in the SERPS. If I find sites who are stealing my content, I either contact them through their contact form, report them to Google through Adsense reporting or make comments on their blog about them stealing my content.
As soon as I realized this, I stopped working on made-for-search-engines type sites and started working on made-for-visitors type sites as my long term plan. And now, noticing the changes Google is implementing, I guess I did the right thing.
many thanks for the article :)
It is good so see that Google does something about those stealing copycat sites.
There is another breed of articles that I find especially annoying:
For example, when I do research for programming, I often find articles that claim to provide a solution, in fact, the heading looks right, the article looks right, however, parts of the articles are just ads for something else that stands in no relation to the rest of the article, and this turns out to be really confusing.
Hopefully, they are going to do something about those sites, too.
Always my best,
John Vorwerk
A little housecleaning by Google normally leaves the web a better place...no matter how much harder it makes online marketers work :-)
after Google's new algorithm.
From what I've read this was supposed to affect people using duplicate content, but I had sites drop where I had written every single article from scratch and wasn't using ANY duplicate content. For some of my sites I don't even rank for the site title or url anymore. Not all of my sites were affected (I have several), but most were. And in case you are wondering - no, I don't do any black hat seo either.
Glad to hear you and Allan have survived floods and earthquake!!!
Regarding your post above, it's important stuff. I recently wrote a 3-part series on "Pap" and how Google is going to be slamming a LOT of small and big sites this year. Part 1 of pap starts at...
http://blog.sitesell.com/sitesell/2011/02/all-that... (links to Parts 2 and 3 follow).
And the follow-up article on Google and what to do is at...
http://blog.sitesell.com/sitesell/2011/02/how-goog...
This is really serious stuff. We've been saying "keep it real" and "add value" for a long time (13 years) while tons of folks worked on borderline link schemes that they thought were safe and on paraphrasing content by others.
It worked, as do all tricks, for a while. But, like all tricks, it never works forever.
The blog posts go into depth about the issues and what to do.
Hoping readers find them useful additions,
Ken
What I didn't know, was that this was easier said than done -- especially DONE RIGHT! That's when I stumbled upon Allan's newsletter and blog.
Allan promotes SiteBuildIt...with Good Reason. Following his lead, I 'Bought Into SBI' (as we call it). GREAT suggestion.
Almost 3 years later, I'm making money, get LOTS of unique & free visitor traffic, and NO WORRIES about the Google-Smackdown. So yes, Content is King...as Long as it's YOUR {original} Content.
Does this mean then that article marketing will die as we know it. For example how do you see me writing articles for my site and then submitting them to the top ten ezines ?
Kind regards
Paul
Great article. As an SEO copywriter (one wearing the purest, whitest hat you can find - yeah I'm a square!) it's welcome news for me. Trying to compete against content that has either been concocted by machines or copy 'sweat shops'is daunting. I've a few affiliate sites that are just 'sitting there' as I've no time to write the content. I've certainly been tempted to take the easy route. Who wouldn't be? After last weeks announcement I am so incredibly glad I didn't/haven't. Writing good content is enough of a challenge. Having then to place it in a SERP race against McDonalds style cookie cutter content makes it feel like that challenge isn't worth it. So yes - the google curse on content farms is very excitng for me - just when I was about to throw in the towel and become a customer service chick at Maccas. Thanks for the great newsletters. One thing - do you think that the chrome spam marking tool will be a boon for competitors who want to be nasty, horrible people and mark good guys as spam? Do you think we need to worry abut that? Here's the link : https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/mmnbhi...
A lot of people might disagree with me, but my instincts tell me that the safest way to do article marketing now and in the future is to write original, useful, interesting articles, submit them to a variety of places, writing a totally DIFFERENT article for every site where you post an article. Also, make article marketing just one small component of your total marketing.
If you do all that, I don't see any possible reason why Google would want to punish you.
However, think about it... If you were a Google engineer, what sort of links would you regard as most valuable? Links that a website owner gets by posting articles on article sites, or links that come from a variety of places and look as though they're voluntary links to useful content?
If you imagine you work for Google and see things from their point of view, you shouldn't go too far wrong.
Back in 05 I got into scraping search engine results using Traffic Equalizer instead of building white hat sites (Martell style) because it looked like too much hard work. But by July 05 Google were on the game and deindexing TE sites as soon as you could build them.
Then I became very successful in first Adsense arbitrage, then domain parking arbitrage.But again Google decided that game was over as too many people in this game could mess up the SERPs.
After a year promting products and services through varuious forms of advertising, I've come full circle and now am building white hat sites publishing articles, news and product reviews in various areas of my interest. Now Google indexes them almost immediately, they rank not too badly for young sites, and are growing each day when I add new original content.
Who knows hopefully one day soon Google will assess my sites to be an authority for many keywords and rank them accordingly. Simply because I now provide value to my site visitors while being aware what Google require from my sites.
Creating webspam, cloaking and all those nasty things are actually hard work for only short term results, while living in daily fear of being deindexed. Whereas in comparison building sites with useful content or srevices is actually quite simple and far more rewarding.
David Paxton
And you're right, Google should've done this a long time ago... I've looked at, even bought a couple of those auto-bloggng programs but never fully implemented them except as tests on a couple of sites that I was unable to keep up... will be interesting to see how all this affects other affiliate marketers down the road... I'm glad this is happening tho and can only make the internet a better neighborhood!
As one who does a lot of research online and testing of new products, I too get frustrated when I do searches and end up with links to link farms, directories, and useless cookie cutter sites full of ads and pop-ups!
However, I do have one question tho... How do you think this will affect the use of PLR and outsourcing?
My clients and friends are always asking me about SEO and how to rank and my first answer for years has always been... Good unique content and plenty of it!
I hope your readers all take note and follow your suggestions! Great advice!
Linda =}
I ask myself, is this really what I want to spend my life doing, spinning articles? No. You have spelt it out for me and others.
Make useful relevant sites and ultimately you will prosper.
Mark
If a person gets a duplicate content set of about 20 articles (like the ones you get in xxxxx and yyyyy) BUT only rewrites every sentence of the home page BUT on the other 19 pages only rewrites the first sentence of every paragraph, AND chooses different main keywords for each article than the other people who are getting the same articles, then wouldn't the "Google duplicate content filters" allow the pages to be found in the search results and not filtered out in any way since the pages are unique for the particular keyword that is calling up the pages to the search results? I am assuming that all other on page and off page SEO stuff is equal to other web sites who are competing for that particular keyword.
Even though not all the content is rewritten and other pages can be found with much of the same content, the reason that Google does not use a content filter for this particular search result is that the content is still unique for the particular keyword that is calling up the content in response to a search engine search summons for a particular keyword...?....!
Please tell me if in this scenario described above it is necessary to rewrite all 20 pages completely or if what I suggested in the first paragraph is enough?
This strategy is now paying off for me as many of my pages are now showing up on the first page of Google and I don't have to worry about these pages suddenly disappearing every time Google makes an algorithm change.
Writing original content is hard work, but it will pay off in the longterm.
I do article marketing and many websites have picked up many of my articles and put them on their sites. I would hardly call that 'spam'. Afterall I do get a backlink when they do.
I think a little more clarification is in order.
If article marketing using the directories is not all that good. What is your master plan?
Larry
Allan, I am glad to hear you are OK.
As people here probably undoubtedly know, New Zealand suffered a second major Earthquake in only a 5 month span. Unfortunately, the company I am most closely affiliated with is located in Christchurch, NZ and they were hit hard. Thankfully, all of their staff is accounted for. However, the situation is no doubt a full blown tragedy. My thoughts and prayers continue for them daily and the people in Christchurch, NZ.
Now, regarding article marketing since my service, www.associateprograms.com/training, revolves around it.
I have seen some results move all over the place. I keep a close eye on my articles and once in a while will punch up various keywords in the niches I'm involved in to see what's going on with the articles and other rankings.
Stuff is definitely moving around but I'm still finding my articles and my student articles easily in Google. So, article marketing certainly is not dead.
The recent Google shifts, of course, have not just affected article marketers, but also I noticed a lot of web sites moving around.
I had a short exchange with Chris Knight on Facebook about this and we both noticed that in many cases a lot of sub par content has actually risen while quality content was knocked down. I'm not sure how enduring these recent changes will be.
Regarding article marketing, in my service, we have always shunned spinning content and insisted members learn to write original, useful content THEMSELVES. (Or hire a freelance writer who will create useful, original content).
The key here was to not purchase article spinning software or actually even PLR. My members also tend to write beefier articles -- not really short stuff. EzineArticles is thinking about implementing a rule where all articles going forward will have to be 400 words minimum.
That would barely affect members of my training service as the vast majority of articles they have written are 400+ words.
One thing mentioned here that I think that will change going forward is writing unique articles SPECIFICALLY for each article directory.
Indeed, on a blog post made just a couple of hours ago at EzineArticles, Chris Knight may be moving forward on requiring this: that is, only original, unique content will be accepted and it can't be submitted elsewhere.
We will all have to see what the eventual fall out will be, but I am optimistic that people who have been doing article marketing legitimately will come out just fine, and may, in fact, even benefit as competition is thinned.
This may or may not benefit EzineArticles as they may have to remove tens of thousands of articles from their directories. Over the longer term, maybe it will benefit them, but they might take a significant hit in the shorter term.
I am gathering my full thoughts on this and will provide an update later on it.
Regards,
Dan
IMHO just doing the first paragraph will not be enough in the long run. Most people I know try for 60-80% uniqueness and that was before this update.
Take the time to get original articles written or sit down and knock out a couple of your own. Surprisingly, writing gets much easier the more often you do it.
Brad :-)
I think that the use of PLR will be greatly affected by this as time moves forward but I have never been a proponent of using PLR content on a site. Use it for email series, ebooks or videos but not as text. It really doesn't take that much time to write original content.
To give you an example, I have a writer who writes 2 x 300 wd articles a day for a new site I'm building. It doesn't sound like much but a month goes past fast and suddenly I'm 60 pages of original content better off. If I was to do 1 a day myself, I would still be 30 articles down the road.
Outsourcers can write original articles. You just need to use good writers. Allan has referred to Content Kingdom above. I would start there if you need a writer and check the articles against copyscape.
Thanks :-)
Brad
You said: "Hi Andrew,
IMHO just doing the first paragraph will not be enough in the long run. Most people I know try for 60-80% uniqueness and that was before this update.
Take the time to get original articles written or sit down and knock out a couple of your own. Surprisingly, writing gets much easier the more often you do it.
Brad :-)"
This did not really answer my question which is just above yours so I am going to redo my question:
Let us say, we were a member of a club where we got 10 beautiful web sites per month and we only wanted to concentrate on the home page and rank for the home page and get it to the top of google. If we rewrote the home page completely and had our own unique keyword domain name for the home page. But on the other 19 pages we only rewrote the first sentence of each paragraph and in about 9 out of those 19 pages even changed the keywords thus distancing the site from a cookie cutter site even more, IS IT NOT REALISTIC THAT THE SITE COULD EASILY RANK #1 IN GOOGLE FOR THE HOME PAGE WHICH HAS UNIQUE CONTENT ON IT, but the other pages would not rank but just help the home page which is completely redone to rank because the rest of the pages are related to the home page but have only the first sentence changed in each of the five paragraphs on those pages?
Thanks, Andrew
I think I did answer most of your question but I will have a go at your rewording.
A website is not made up of a homepage but a collection of pages all which form part of the way google ranks sites. They take everything into consideration, not just the homepage. Just changing a sentence in each paragraph does not make a unique sub page.
Yes, you may get good rankings. I can't tell you that but if you're working in competitive markets, you should use orignal content on all pages.
Feel free to concentrate on the homepage only if that's how you wish to work. I wouldn't but I wish you luck.
Thanks :-)
Brad